I don’t smoke or drink or even chew gum. My vice: I buy
books. Many are worthy of any good library, many, some of you might think, are
not. Recent purchases in the former
category include Jacques Barzun’s From
Dawn to Decadence: 1500 to the Present, and the Merriam Webster New Book of Word Histories. The
latter? Well, let’s just call them Fiction: Romances, Mysteries, Romance
Mysteries – I’ve a long list of
favorite authors.
Since 1990 when I stopped lumping in book money with the
rest of our entertainment expenditures, I’ve spent just over $14,000.00 on
books, many of them used. Egad! That’s a nice chunk of change. I’m sure the lifetime total would be nicely
impressive too, and I delight in every dollar’s worth.
I was reading Theodore Dalrymple’s essay Why
second-hand bookshops are just my type, and I came upon the telling of a
bibliomaniac whose library was sold after his death for only a third of what
he’d paid for the massive collection. I sold off my college text books – about
twenty years later - but I can’t imagine selling my books now. I’ve always
given them away when I was finished with them. I’ve read many of my books four
or five times, but usually when I’ve read a book twice – or have gotten only
part way into a real dud – it goes into the bag to be taken to the library for
the sale room. Sell them? I’ve not got
the time: I’m reading!
Dalrymple’s essay mourns the passing of second-hand
bookshops. I’ve rarely had the pleasure of browsing in a second-hand bookshop.*
I do now have the pleasure of browsing in second-hand book sites on line. My
favorite is Thrift Books, and
Britain’s Awesome Books is pretty
well that: awesome.
Really, really esoteric volumes can sometimes be found,
used, of course, at Amazon – but then, what can’t
you find at Amazon? I do browse the
shelves of the sale room at the library – always going with book lists in hand
to be sure I’ve not read that one before, always looking for new treasures.
(And library sale rooms are great sources for children’s books. I’ve got on
hand new birthday and Christmas books
for my granddaughters will into 2016, but used
books are great to hand out throughout the year for un-birthdays and
such.)
I don’t know if you’ll think this good or bad, but though
I’ve always belonged to the library wherever we lived and occasionally do check
out books, I’d really rather own a book than borrow it. If it is mine I can
take as long as I want to read it: though I read many books in a week, it gives
me the itch to have a time limit on
my reading. If it is mine I am happy to
let it just sit in my stack of to-be-read and enjoy its being there.
In one paragraph, talking about the pleasures of finding
markings and various papers and bookmarks in used books, Dalrymple says “there is no substitute for being able to
hold the physical book in one’s hand.” I agree wholeheartedly – but for another
reason on another plane: I don’t think I’ll ever be comfortable with an
electronic book. A good friend of mine
has shown me the wonders of her iPad, and how she can enlarge the type, and how
it remembers where she left off, and all the other delights of electronic
reading. Not for me. I want to be able
to flip back to that remembered reference to a certain character or place – and
I remember it was on the left hand page about two inches from the bottom. Yes,
there it is. I remembered the ‘landmarks’.
Can’t do that with an electronic book.
This is just a fraction of th books I once owned. I keep them and all my litle dustables in our bedroom - this way none of it has to be dusted very often. |
I want to hold
the book and not have to be too careful not to drop it in the toilet if I’m in
a bathroom reading session – though there I usually read magazines. I want to
refer every once in a while to the jacket’s cover picture or inside blurb and
bio. I want to see my books – especially the ones I’ve kept and reread for years. Just seeing the books on the shelf gives me a
fleeting remembrance of the story. I can’t get that feeling with an electronic
device.
Books are neat
and compact, easier to collect and store and dust (though I rarely do) than say
salt and pepper shakers or automobilia. Yes, for many reasons on many levels,
I’ll stick to books as my vice of choice.
*but I love pictures of them – so higgledy-piggledy, stacks
and stacks. As the bibliophile’s lament
goes: So many books, so little time.
Ahhh.....books. From one bibliophile to another, great post!
ReplyDelete